The Impact of Tax Audit Intensity and Probability of Fraud Detection on Tax Evasion: The Moderating Role of Tax Officials' Service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62504/jsi936Keywords:
Tax Audit Intensity, Probability of Fraud Detection, Tax EvasionAbstract
This study investigates the relationships between tax audit intensity, the probability of fraud detection, and tax evasion while examining the moderating role of tax officials' service. The research reveals that tax audit intensity significantly reduces tax evasion, confirming its effectiveness as a deterrent. However, the hypothesis regarding the probability of fraud detection's impact on tax evasion was rejected, indicating that the likelihood of detection does not directly influence taxpayer behavior in this context. Additionally, the study found no significant moderating effect of tax officials' service on the relationship between tax audit intensity, fraud detection probability, and tax evasion. These findings suggest that while audit intensity is crucial for enhancing compliance, the quality of service provided by tax officials does not substantially alter taxpayer responses to enforcement measures. The results underscore the need for tax authorities to prioritize strengthening audit processes and detection mechanisms while recognizing that service quality, though important for building long-term trust, may not significantly influence immediate compliance behavior. Future research should explore other moderating factors that could impact taxpayer decisions in varying economic and cultural contexts.
Downloads
References
Alm, J., & Kasper, M. (2020). The deterrent effect of tax audits: Does audit strategy matter? Journal of Public Economics, 185(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104150
Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2020). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 203–217.
Batrancea, L., Nichita, R. A., & Batrancea, I. (2019). Tax Compliance Behavior: An Empirical Investigation across Countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 70, 91–106.
Blaufus, K., Bobek, D. D., Otto, P. E., & Retchford, G. L. (2020). The role of tax audits and audit quality in tax compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 835–852.
Castro, M. F., & Rizzo, G. (2021). Tax compliance and audit effects in Latin America. Journal of Public Economics, 200, 104–123.
Fuadi, A., & Wulandari, D. S. (2024). Enhancing Tax Compliance: The Role of Awareness, Regulation Understanding, and Perceived System Effectiveness Among Self-Employed Individuals. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis Pelita Bangsa, 9(1).
Fuadi, Wulandari, D. S., & Lestari, D. S. (2023). Love of Money, Religiosity, and Tax Understanding on Tax Evasion. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(8).
Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Tax audits, audit quality, and tax compliance: A behavioral economics perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 20–35.
Gangl, K., Torgler, B., & Kirchler, E. (2020). Tax audits and their influence on voluntary tax compliance: The role of trust and social norms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176, 661–681.
Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2020). The impact of trust and power on tax compliance in enforcement situations. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 86, 101–110.
Hoopes, J. L., Robinson, L., & Slemrod, J. (2020). Public tax-return disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69((2-3)). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101304
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, L. (2020). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 70, 110–120.
Kleven, H. J., Knudsen, M. B., Kreiner, C. T., Pedersen, S., & Saez, E. (2020). Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a randomized tax audit experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 88(2).
Kogler, C., Mittone, L., & Kirchler, E. (2019). The power of moral suasion in tax compliance: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 81(1), 1–12.
Mascagni, G. (2020). From the lab to the field: A review of tax experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 813–847.
Pomeranz, D. (2019). No taxation without information: Deterrence and self-enforcement in the value-added tax. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2539–2569.
Purba, J., Wulandari, D. S., & Widyaningsih, W. (2024). Tingkat Pemahaman Pajak, Penerapan E-Filing Dan Sanksi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Selama Masa Pandemi Dengan Peran Lingkungan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis Pelita Bangsa, 9(1).
Wulandari, D. S. (2021). Perencanaan Pajak dan Intensitas Aset Tetap terhadap Manajemen Laba: Agency Theory Perspective. JAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance), 5(2).
Wulandari, D. S. (2023). The Willingness of Individual Taxpayers to Pay Taxes. Proceeding International Pelita Bangsa, 1(01).
Wulandari, D. S., & Cahyonowati, N. (2024). A Bibliometric Examination of Studies on Corporate Tax Avoidance Utilizing Vosviewer Software. Jurnal Proaksi, 11(2).
Wulandari, D. S., Wibowo, E. T., & Ricardo, P. (2023). Machiavellian, Equity Sensitivity, and Law Enforcement on the Perception of Tax Evasion Ethics. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(9)..
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Bukhori Muslim, Dian Sulistyorini wulandari, Ita Sari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
