Judicial Reasoning in Sidoarjo District Court Decision No. 199/Pid.Sus/2023: Corporate Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr1360Keywords:
Corporate criminal liability, Environmental law, Strict liability, Legal reasoning, Identification theoryAbstract
This study analyzes the judicial reasoning behind Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo No. 199/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Sda, a landmark decision involving corporate criminal liability for environmental violations in Indonesia. The case centers on PT Surya Prima Semesta’s illegal disposal of hazardous waste (fly ash and bottom ash) without an environmental permit, resulting in the prosecution of its corporate director. Employing a normative juridical method, the research examines the court’s application of doctrines such as strict liability and identification theory within the framework of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. The findings show that the court adopted a formalistic, text-based legal reasoning model, treating permit violations as inherently punishable acts regardless of actual environmental harm. While the decision reinforces regulatory compliance and affirms corporate culpability, it lacks engagement with broader organizational responsibility and foundational environmental law principles like the precautionary principle and sustainability. This study argues for a more integrated doctrinal approach one that balances rule-based logic with value-oriented reasoning to enhance legal consistency, advance environmental justice, and align Indonesia’s corporate accountability framework with international standards.
Downloads
References
Baroni, P., Toni, F., & Verheij, B. (2020). On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and N-Person Games: 25 years later. Argument & Computation, 11(1–2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200901
Dyrda, A., & Gizbert-Studnicki, T. (2020). The Limits of Theoretical Disagreements in Jurisprudence. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 35(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09795-6
Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., Torodji, R., & Hartiwiningsih, H. (2024). The Criminal Justice System in Environmental Crime by Corporations. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i21.14797
Handono, J., & Setiyono, J. (2023). Corporate Accountability for the Illegal Crimes of Human Trafficking in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(08). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-86
Hapiz, M. A. A., Zakuan, Z. Z. M., Mahmood, A., & Syafriadi, H. (2022). Deferred Prosecution Agreement: A Tool to Deter Environmental Crime by Corporations in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(22), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i22.4158
Inayah, I. (2020). Corporate Criminal Liability. JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik), 8(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v8i2.3586
Mrabure, K. O., & Abhulimhen-Iyoha, A. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Criminal Liability in Nigeria and Other Jurisdictions. Beijing Law Review, 11(02), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.112027
Parker, M., & Dodge, M. (2022). An Exploratory Study of Deferred Prosecution Agreements and the Adjudication of Corporate Crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 940–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2022-0122
PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia, 19(19), 19.
Pujiono, S. (2023). Putusan PN SIDOARJO Nomor 199/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Sda. PN SIDOARJO. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee10af52f68054a67c313034363039.html
Pujiyono, P., & Riyanta, S. (2020). Corporate Criminal Liability in the Collapse of Bank Century in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2020.81.1.11
Soekiman, S., Brumadyadisty, G., Firdaus, M. Y., Suprayitno, D., & Lisdiantini, N. (2025). Facing Digital Transformation: The Role of the Prakerja Program in Enhancing Indonesian Workforce Competencies. PENA JUSTISIA: MEDIA KOMUNIKASI DAN KAJIAN HUKUM, 24(2), 5963–5991.
Sriwidodo, J. (2023). Enforcement of Law Against Corporations That Commit Environmental Crime and Transnational Crime. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e2207. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2207
Steging, C., Renooij, S., Verheij, B., & Bench‐Capon, T. (2023). Arguments, Rules and Cases in Law: Resources for Aligning Learning and Reasoning in Structured Domains. Argument & Computation, 14(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-220017
Sufa, S. A., Sumartias, S., Zubair, F., Perbawasari, S., & Aristi, N. (2025). Government Communications to Address Online Prostitution: Social Strategies for Awareness. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 19(2), 1266. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v19i2.4113
Wijaya, M. A., & Dzaki, A. I. (2023). Corporate Criminal Liability on Environmental Law: Indonesia and Australia. Mulawarman Law Review, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i2.1306
Winjaya, D. K., & Pujiyono, P. (2023). The Juridical Analysis of Corporate Crimes Accountability in the Indonesian Penal System. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(07). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-81
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samsul Hadi, Dudik Djaja Sidarta, Renda Aranggraeni, M. Yustino Aribawa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
