Transformation Of Islamic Education Management In The Digital Era: Trends And Implications For Learning Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr924Keywords:
Management Transformation, Trends and Implications, Learning QualityAbstract
This research aims to examine the transformation of Islamic education management in the digital era and its implications for the quality of learning, with a focus on the innovation of technology use in teaching and administration. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach, collecting data through interviews, observations, and documentation in several Islamic educational institutions that have implemented digital technology. Research results reveal that the adoption of technology such as Learning Management Systems (LMS), e-learning platforms, and administrative digitization has improved the effectiveness of the learning process and the efficiency of school management. The findings also indicate that this transformation brings significant changes to the organizational culture, creating higher transparency and accountability in the management of educational institutions. The novelty of this research lies in the comprehensive analysis of the challenges and strategies faced by Islamic educational institutions in aligning technological advancements with traditional values, as well as the emphasis on the importance of continuous training for educators to enhance technological competence. Nevertheless, there are still obstacles such as limited infrastructure and a lack of digital literacy among educators. This research concludes that digital transformation in Islamic educational institutions offers great potential in improving the quality of education, provided it is accompanied by the enhancement of educators' capacities and equitable access to technology
Downloads
References
A. Khan, R., & Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2021). Technology Adoption Theories and Models. In R. A. Khan & H. Qudrat-Ullah, Adoption of LMS in Higher Educational Institutions of the Middle East (pp. 27–48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50112-9_5
Akrim, A. (2022). A new direction of Islamic education in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(01), 35–48.
Bakar, M. A., Umroh, K. A., & Hameed, F. (2023). Improving Quality Islamic Education for Today’s Generation. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 2(2), 118–128.
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, 2, 1–6.
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150.
Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68–92.
Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234
Ekasari, S., Manullang, S. O., Syakhrani, A. W., & Amin, H. (2021). Understanding Islamic Education Management in Digital Era: What Experts Say. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 127–143.
Erbil, D. G. (2020). A review of flipped classroom and cooperative learning method within the context of Vygotsky theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157.
Fawait, A., Siyeh, W. F., & Aslan, A. (2024). ISLAMIC EDUCATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LEARNING IN MADRASAS. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(2), 657–665.
Han, W. (2020). Using information technology to improve ideological and political education and student management efficiency in colleges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(2), 022126. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022126/meta
Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts in qualitative research methodology: Participant observation and interview process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5–10.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95.
Mustapa, K., Gagaramusu, Y. B. M., Palandi, E. H., Syakhrani, A. W., & Towpek, H. (2023). TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED EDUCATION: NURTURING THE DIGITAL GENERATION-EXPERIENCES IN ISLAMIC SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 16–40.
NALÇACIGİL, E., & ÖZYILMAZ, P. C. A. F. (2020). The Effect Of Information Management And Innovation On Business Performance. Current Studies In Social Science, 119.
Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
Onyema, E. M. (2020). Integration of emerging technologies in teaching and learning process in Nigeria: The challenges. Central Asian Journal of Mathematical Theory and Computer Sciences, 1(11), 35–39.
Qazi, A., Hardaker, G., Ahmad, I. S., Darwich, M., Maitama, J. Z., & Dayani, A. (2021). The role of information & communication technology in elearning environments: A systematic review. Ieee Access, 9, 45539–45551.
Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, S., Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S3), 89–107.
Shunkov, V., Shevtsova, O., Koval, V., Grygorenko, T., Yefymenko, L., Smolianko, Y., & Kuchai, O. (2022). Prospective directions of using multimedia technologies in the training of future specialists. http://erpub.chnpu.edu.ua:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8033
Washington, L. D., Penny, G. R., & Jones, D. (2020). Perceptions of Community College Students and Instructors on Traditional and Technology-Based Learning in a Hybrid Learning Environment. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1241972
Zhang, Y., & Lin, C.-H. (2020). Student interaction and the role of the teacher in a state virtual high school: What predicts online learning satisfaction? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1694061
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Holilah, Wafi Ali Hajjaj (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
