Freedom of Speech as a Pillar of Equality in Indonesia in The Context of Constitutional Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62504/crdxyx50Keywords:
Freedom of Expression, Equality, Constitutional LawAbstract
The important role of freedom of expression as a basis for equality, especially within the framework of constitutional law, is very important in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical qualitative methods to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the legal aspects that regulate freedom of expression in the country. Recognized as an essential human right, freedom of expression is explicitly protected by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The focus of this research is to examine the legal norms governing freedom of expression, which include provisions such as Article 28E paragraph (3) and Article 19 of the Constitution 1945, as well as other statutory regulations. The research results show that freedom of expression is recognized as an inalienable right by the state and is one of the foundations for the realization of a just and democratic society. Although freedom of expression is guaranteed by the constitution, this research also highlights the obstacles and challenges in its implementation. In Indonesia, challenges arise in navigating diverse interpretations of freedom of expression, with concerns about potential exploitation by entities harming public interest. Striking a balance between freedom of expression and societal stability/security is deemed crucial. The research aims to better understand the complexity of freedom of expression within the country's constitutional law and its role in promoting equality. This research aims to find useful insights for creating better policies. These policies should strike a good balance between individual freedom and public interest, ultimately fostering a fair and democratic society.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Amnesty. (2021). Freedom of expression. https://www.amnesty.id/kebebasan-berekspresi/
Coal, J. (2017). Qualitative Research Paradigm and Philosophy of Science in Counseling. Journal of Focus Counseling, 3(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.26638/jfk.387.2099
Belanusa, Z. S., Kartikasari, R., &; Cahyadini, A. (2020). The urgency of implementing good corporate governance in regional-owned enterprises in oil and gas management through participating interest ownership. Journal of Jurisprudence, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i1.9974
Benedek, W., &; Kettemann, M. C. (2013). Freedom of Expression. Media Asia, 23(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.1996.11726503
Centre for Law and Democracy, &; International Media Support. (2014). Briefing Note Series: Freedom of Expression.
Cha, K. (2023). Freedom of speech in international regulations in the face of digital media development.
CNN. (2024). MUI Bali Officially Police Arya Wedakarna for Alleged Blasphemy. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20240112193958-12-1048866/mui-bali-resmi-polisikan-arya-wedakarna-atas-dugaan-penistaan-agama
Department of Religious Affairs. (2014). Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1/PNPS of 1965. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 2(1), 1–7.
Dr.H. Indra Muchlis Adnan. SH.MH.MM.Ph.D; (2017). Constitutional Law in Indonesia.
Ellandra, A. Z., Faqih, M., &; Azizi, K. (2022). Status quo regulation of the Presidential Contempt Article as a restriction on constitutional rights related to freedom of expression in Indonesia and its potential future regulation: A case study of Presidential Contempt on Social Media (Ruslan Buton Case). Journal of Studia Legalia, 3(01), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61084/jsl.v3i01.20
Harijanti, P., Melinda, T., &; Krisprimandoyo, D. A. (2021). The Effect of Leadership, Motivation, and Organizational Culture on the Performance of Employees of PT X. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 655–662. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i5.8849
Junaidi, M. (2017). CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, VIEWS AND IDEAS OF MODERNIZATION OF THE RULE OF LAW. In PT RajaGrafindo Persada (Vol. 2).
Kholifah, N. (2018). Equality of human rights before the law within the framework of the welfare state. They are, 2, 27–28. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=536002%5C&val=5918%5C&title=Kesetaraan Human Rights Before the Law within the Framework of the Welfare State
Kogoya, W. (2015). Constitutional Theory and Science. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Vol. 3, April Issue).
Compass. (2017). World Body Criticism of Blasphemy Law, This is the Response of the National Police. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/05/12/17225441/kritik.badan.dunia.soal.pasal.penodaan.agama.ini.tanggapan.polri
Compass. (2023a). Bima Case and Dynamics of Freedom of Opinion on Social Media. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2023/04/18/kasus-bima-dan-dinamika-kebebasan-berpendapat-di-media-sosial
Compass. (2023b). The Journey of Lina Mukherjee Case, Creating Pork Eating Content to Sentenced to 2 Years in Prison. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2023/09/20/154500178/perjalanan-kasus-lina-mukherjee-buat-konten-makan-babi-hingga-divonis-2?page=all#
Cash. (2019). Robertus Robet was charged with insulting the ruler or legal entity in Indonesia. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/robertus-robet-dijerat-pasal-penghinaan-penguasa-atau-badan-hukum-di-indonesia
Coverage6. (2023). 6 Blasphemy Cases That Shocked the Country Before Panji Gumilang, Ahok's Drama Was Most Highlighted. https://www.liputan6.com/surabaya/read/5359786/6-kasus-kasus-penistaan-agama-yang-menghebohkan-tanah-air-sebelum-panji-gumilang-drama-ahok-paling-disorot?page=3
Mainake, Y., &; Nola, L. F. (2020). The impact of multi-interpretation articles in the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. Journal of Short Info , XII, 1–6.
NADIA, F. (2018). ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW IN LAW ENFORCEMENT (Case Study of Hate Speech in the Jurisdiction of the Tanjung Karang District Court).
Octora, R. (2022). Criminalization of the Action of Submitting Criticism to The Government Based on The Electronic Information and Transaction Law in Indonesia, And Protection of The Right to Freedom of Speech in A Democratic Country. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 05(05), 1975–1983. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i5-46
Prabawa, E., Widjayanto, J., Ali, Y., Saragih, H., Sarjito, A., &; Sufa, S. A. (2022). Intercultural Communication Strategy of the Indonesian National Army (TNI) in Papua. Journal of Communication Research, 5(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v5i1.479
Rizky Pratama Putra Karo Karo. (2023). Hate Speech: Deviations from the ITE Law, Freedom of Opinion and Dignified Justice Values. Journal of Lemhannas RI, 10(4), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v10i4.370
Sayuti, S., &; Yanti, I. (2023). Freedom of Speech Without a Direction: Criticism of Promotion of Freedom of Speech in Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum for Legal and Social Studies, 23(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1389
Sukadi, I. (2011). The Powerless of Law in the Process of Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Treatise of Law, 7(1), 39–53.
Walukow, J. M. (2013). THE REALIZATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW FOR PRISONERS IN PRISONS IN INDONESIA. 1(1), 163. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/viewFile/1320/1071
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yovan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
